Reading Time: 3 minutes

KEMP’s LoadMaster family of affordable, yet feature rich application delivery controllers and server load balancer appliances automatically and intelligently manage user traffic and applications, to deliver website integrity for small-to-medium sized businesses (SMB) and managed service providers.

KEMP LoadMaster is an hardened Linux appliance that provide several features:

  • Server Load Balancing for TCP/UDP based protocols
  • NAT-based forwarding or Direct Server Return (DSR) configurations
  • Layers 4-7 Load Balancing
  • Layer 7 Content Switching
  • Server Persistence
  • Windows Terminal Services load balancing and persistence with Session Directory integration
  • SSL Termination/Offload/Acceleration
  • Application Front-end (Caching, Compression and IPS security)
  • Advanced, App-Transparent Caching Engine for HTTP/HTTPS protocols
  • Optimized Compression for Static and Dynamic HTTP/HTTPS Content
  • Layer 7 Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), SNORT-Rule (HTTP) Compatible
  • Configurable S-NAT support
  • Web User Interface (WUI) for easy administration & configuration
  • Industry leading price/performance value
  • Supports cloning and relocating with native Virtualization Framework management tools

The load balancing is based on a customized version of Linux Virtual Server. But several other deaemons implement features like proxy, L7, IDS, …

There are both physical and virtual version of the appliance (see also the full comparison). For the virtual edition the main difference is:

  • VLM-100: Max. 100 Mbps Throughput, max. 100 SSL TPS, everything else unrestricted. Actual performance will depend on allocated resources to Virtual Machine.
  • VLM-1000: Up to 1000 SSL TPS, everything else unrestricted. Actual performance will depend on allocated resources to Virtual Machine.

Note that there are several distributors, but also some big hardware vendors sell KEMP solution (for example see this page on the Dell Accessories catalog… maybe a sign for a possible future acquisition?)

Why a load balancer?

For enterprise architecture, a load balancer is the external solution needed to provide a better availability (and scalability) level for a service. Actually several services may require a load balancer in their architecture, for example:

  • VMware View: require load balancers both for the Security Servers and the View Connection Servers
  • Exchange: require load balancers for some roles, like the CAS
  • Terminal Server/RDS Host: although it can use the Windows solution (NLB), it can use also external load balancers.

Why KEMP?

This could be a good question, especially for the virtual appliance. There are already a lot of similar solutions (some also free) and also VMware has some similar appliance integrated with vSphere (vShield Zones /vShied Edge).

One simple reason could be that most of the appliance are most firewall oriented (included vShield solutions), with really limited feature at load balancing side. In most cases they can still can be used just for the firewall part. VLM focus is on load balancing, that mean also several paper and documentation and recommendation for different type of application (for example, for Exchange see: Differences in Exchange Load Balancing recommendations by Microsoft and vendors).

The other features covered by VLM are usually the complementary part, like SSL acceleration, proxy, application check and protection, … and this make the KEMP solution a good appliance for all applications that need those services.

Finally there could be also the reason related to the platform: actually KEMP support both VMware and Hyper-V and this could be good value in multi-hypervisors enviroments.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

As written in a previous post, one of the possible criteria to value as good is a IT certification is correlate it to the real request on the IT world. Maybe is a material criteria, but it protect the investment and also make possible grow the skills of the certification (you must make practice or certifications just become useless).

The request  and the offer could be loosely estimated by the salaries: usually where are high it mean that the request is high and of offer maybe is not enough (or simple that the skill is value high).

continue reading…

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Seems confirmed that Toronto (Ontario, Canada) VCDX defense will be the last for the VCDX4. It is schedule in the week of May 7 through 11, 2012, but the registration has closed some weeks ago (as usual to give the right time to analyse the applications).

Previously, by popular demand, the VCDX program has added another opportunities to attempt VCDX4 (as written also in the post “New (and last?) VCDX defense opportunity“).

But now, seems confirmed, on the VMware Community, that the next defense after Toronto will be a new type of VCDX (strange but is not yet called VCDX5, but VCD.next). Some interesting information are available still on a post on the VMware Community:

If you have a vSphere 5 based design that also includes a fully documented deployment of vCenter Site Recovery Manager, and/or a VMware View-based desktop deployment, and/or a VMware vCloud Director-based Private or Hybrid vCloud Solution, you may be better positioned than others to attempt the VCD.next credential.

If you are already a VCDX, the path to VCD.next will be announced in conjunction with the release of prerequisite certifications. If you have not yet achieved VCDX you may indicate your desire to pursue a VCD.next credential in 2012 by pre-registering.

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Dell today announced it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire Wyse Technology, the global leader in cloud client computing, to significantly extend its desktop virtualization offerings. After the recent AppAssure and SonicWall acquisition is a new move to increase the solutions portfolio: the addition of Wyse will expand Dell’s desktop virtualization capabilities and provide new solutions and services opportunities for the full range of Dell’s enterprise offerings.

Wyse’s assets will add to Dell’s existing desktop virtualization offerings, Desktop Virtualization Solution Simplified and Desktop Virtualization Solution Enterprise, and its recent Desktop as a Service (DaaS) partnership with Desktone.

Could be interesting see what will happen to existing Optiplex FX solution that provide similar features of Wyse solutions.

As the press release notes, the transaction was approved by the board of directors of each company. Additional terms of the transaction were not disclosed. The transaction remains subject to customary conditions and is expected to close in the second quarter of Dell’s FY13.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

As written, VMware has release a week ago the new version of VMware View 5.0.1 (with the new build 640055), as also the new version of vSphere 5.0U1.

Note that the VMware Composer remain the same 2.7.0 (build 481620) of previous version. As report in the VMware View 5.0 Installation Guide (page 10), the VMware Composer is compatible with vSphere 5.0 and later, so it is just a piece that will not need any upgrade.

Actually the View documentation is not changes to reflect the new version, it remain a simple 5.0 version. So the Upgrade Guide can help to perform the upgrade from a major release (see also my post Upgrade path to vSphere 5 – The View 5 part), but not too much for the 5.0 to 5.0.1 upgrade.

Actually I’ve verified different paths and the result remain just the same:

  • upgrade the View Manager part (all the Connection Server)
  • upgrade the View Secure Server (is just a new reinstallation, require a new pairing and will drop all the connection on it)
  • upgrade the vSphere part from 5.0 to 5.0 U1 (and be done also as a first step without issue)
  • upgrade the VMware Tools and then the View Agent on the master images
  • recompose the pools
  • upgrade the other parts

The vCenter Server upgrade does not break any Composer functionally, so you do not really to reinstall or repair his installation.

The only issue that I’ve got was with a Windows XP pool: in this case using the order VMware Tools -> View Agent break some VMware Tools components that become not updated. In right way (to resolve the issue) was first the new View Agent and then the VMware Tools.

Reading Time: 2 minutes

Last week VMware release a complete update of the entire cloud platform, including the new vSphere 5.0 Update 1.

But, compared with the 5.0 version, the new vCenter Server 5.0 U1 has a new feature (of bug, depending of the point of view) that now disable the VM Startup & Shutdown properties for all the host (also old version) in a VMware cluster:

continue reading…

Reading Time: 4 minutes

I’ve read some posts (see in the bottom of this post for the references) and I notice how the  hypervisor comparison and choosing criteria are still a interesting trend and not only a marketing battle between different vendors (and maybe there will be more interest will be on this aspects with the release of Windows Server 8).

But in several cases the comparison is limited to the hypervisor technical characteristics (and I’ve already written something about Hyper-V 3.0, XenServer 6.0 and RHEV 3.0) without considering (except in some cases) that the those are only one of the possible choice criteria.

continue reading…

© 2025-2011 vInfrastructure Blog | Disclaimer & Copyright